|
|
 |
| 
AQMD
Fleet Rules – Toxic Equivalency Formula
A De Facto Ban on Clean
Diesel Fuel
| The South Coast Air Quality
Management District (AQMD) is proposing a policy
which would cost taxpayers, schools, cities, counties,
transit agencies and others millions of dollars
for a plan which bans the most cost-effective,
practical clean-air technology currently available:
Low Sulfur Diesel ("Clean Diesel").
|
The South Coast
Clean Air Partnership urges the AQMD to adopt a flexible
fuel-neutral policy – setting a strict emissions
standard for all fuels, which would allow the
use of the most cost-effective, practical clean fuel.
Current policy is NOT fuel-neutral. Here’s why:
-
AQMD Has
Set A Discriminatory Double Standard.
The AQMD has adopted five rules
setting requirements on the new purchases of transit
and other public fleets. AQMD’s policy gives the
"appearance" of fuel-neutrality when
in fact its "toxic emissions formula"
sets one emissions standard for natural gas vehicles
and another – more strict – for clean diesel vehicles.
In fact, the AQMD’s diesel standard is more stringent
than many natural gas vehicles can meet. The result
is a de facto ban on clean diesel technology.
Low sulfur diesel in conjunction with
advance catalyst technology substantially reduces
toxic compounds in diesel exhaust. However, the
AQMD continues to use a health risk factor for diesel
that does not take this into account. The risk factor
AQMD is using is based on emissions from high sulfur
diesel used in 1950s era locomotives; a very different
fuel and a very different technology from today’s
clean diesel engines.
The health risks of natural gas engine
emissions are undetermined. However, a recent Harvard
study and new Swedish research suggest emissions
from clean diesel engines may actually be safer
than those from natural gas engines.
The SCCAP is a coalition of school
districts, transit agencies, public officials, petroleum
manufacturers and other businesses supporting a
fair, "fuel-neutral" policy.
Allowing public
agencies the option to use clean diesel technology
in addition to natural gas means we would achieve
emission reductions sooner than if these agencies
are forced into a natural gas-only policy.
Clean diesel engines are about 90%
cleaner than the diesel engines in use today. They
achieve these air quality benefits by using new
engine, fuel and catalytic exhaust treatment technologies
to remove nitrogen oxide (Nox) and particulate matter
(PM) from diesel exhaust. This new technology means
that Clean Diesel can compete with natural gas when
it comes to environmental benefits. And, Clean Diesel
can begin delivering cleaner air much sooner than
natural gas vehicles because the fuel delivery infrastructure
already exists. More dirty diesel buses can be taken
off the road sooner by retrofitting them with new
technology as opposed to buying new natural gas
vehicle.
-
…At A Fraction
Of The Cost.
School districts support SCCAP because,
not only can clean diesel compete effectively
on emissions reductions, it out-performs natural
gas on cost. A new CNG school bus costs $130,000;
new clean diesel bus costs $90,000 - $100,000.
Retrofitting an existing diesel bus costs only
about $6,000. Because they cost less to buy and
operate, school districts could afford to convert
more of their dirty bus fleets to clean buses
if they were allowed the option to use clean diesel.
For example: A school district could better improve
air quality for their students by converting approximately
20 late model diesel buses to clean diesel technology
usage for the same cost as buying just one CNG
bus.
- Health and Safety is An
Issue, Too.
Safety concerns about natural gas
vehicles have been raised. The National Fire Protection
Association gives natural gas its highest hazard-ranking
for flammability.
Join Us In Urging
AQMD to Support A Fair Fuel-Neutral Policy for Public
Fleets!
South Coast Clean Air Partnership
· 528 Arizona Ave., #209
Santa Monica, CA 90401 · 310-576-1341 ·
Fax: 310-576-0968
SCCAP1@AOL.com
(10-30-00)
|| Top of Page || |
|
|
| |
 |
|