Western States Petroleum Association
About Us Issues and Publications News Room WSPA Associates Member's Corner Related Links WSPA States Site Map
Oil Derrick

 
Home

 

The Science of Ozone Formation in the San Joaquin Valley  

When the state adopted the air quality improvement plan for the San Joaquin Valley in 1994, the fundamental premise for ozone reduction was straightforward: reduction of "ozone precursors" would result in a corresponding reduction in ozone. Ozone precursors are the individual chemical emissions that combine through a chemical reaction to create ozone, namely volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Eight years later, despite significant reductions in precursor emissions and a reduction in the number of days the federal standard has been exceeded, the Valley's air quality has improved but not as much as would have been expected from the reduction in precursor emissions. And the air quality still does not meet national health standards.

Since 1986, a partnership of the oil industry, agriculture, business and government called the San Joaquin Valley Study Agency has closely examined the air quality in the Valley through a continuing set of studies, the most recent being the Central California Ozone Study (CCOS). That study has found that simply reducing the main constituents of ozone equally, everywhere and on everyone has not produced the ozone reductions that were expected. Unfortunately, everything we have learned in the past 16 years about ozone formation in the Valley points to a process far more complicated than anyone imagined.

Scientists now believe:

  • As the concentration of precursors in the air is reduced, the chemical reaction that forms ozone becomes more efficient. This means that as the tons of VOC and NOx are reduced, the corresponding rate of reduction in ozone is less and less. This means that more and more tons of emissions need to be removed from the air to achieve the comparable ozone reductions. For example, if a 20% reduction of precursors resulted in a 5% reduction of ozone, it would now take a 30% reduction in precursors to achieve the next 5% ozone reduction, etc.
  • In many regions, if VOC and NOx are reduced in equivalent amounts, ozone reduction is less efficient than if one or the other of the precursors is reduced alone. Unfortunately, which precursor to reduce is not always clear, and often depends on when and where the precursors are present. That is, not all the solutions for all of the subregions in the district would be the same.
  • Meteorological conditions always control the production of ozone. Hot, still days most often produce levels of ozone that exceed the standards. Therefore, current ozone reduction strategies are based on controlling precursor emissions assuming the "worst case" weather conditions. Unfortunately, controlling emissions to meet worst-case situations does not avoid all violations of the standards. Results of the CCOS may provide more information to understand how the variables that control ozone production combine to create ozone levels that exceed standards even when worst case conditions do not occur.

What we do know about the chemistry of the Valley's air quality is due in large part to the unprecedented $18 million partnership of the federal and state governments, industry and agriculture, with the studies conducted under the leadership of the Study Agency. The CCOS ranges north-south from Redding to the Mojave Desert, and from the Pacific ocean to the Eastern Sierra Nevada Mountains. It consists of a comprehensive field program, a master database of field measurements, data analysis and modeling and emissions inventories. Much of what is known to date about air quality in the Valley is the direct result of this effort. The inventories and modeling from this study will be essential to develop control strategies and measures to achieve attainment in the future.

The complicated interactions that produce ozone appear to suggest that, at least in the San Joaquin Valley, localized geographic and temporal emission controls may be more effective than region-wide responses. Unfortunately, despite our improved understanding of the chemical and regional behavior of ozone forming emissions, more information is necessary to be able to tailor effective control strategies for the region and smaller areas within the region where exceedences may be localized.

The long-term and broad-based commitment to the development of good science must continue to be an integral component of our attainment strategy.

|| Top of Page ||