| Why
Severe Designation is Harmful
All parties agree we won't make attainment
in 2005; EPA sanctions are inevitable.
$2 billion in frozen federal highway funding.
$36 million a year in new fees on existing
small and large businesses - unless they cut
emissions by at least 20 percent.
New federal Title V regulations sooner on
small and mid-sized businesses.
Bigger pollution reductions required for
new job-creating industry; "emission
reduction credits" aren't available and
could hinder new job-creating industry.
May result in costly litigation, replacing
local decision making with federal judges
and federal regulators.
Federal Implementation Plan: EPA steps in
- we lose control of our destiny.
- Decisions made in Washington, DC
- Driving restrictions
- Limits individual choices
- Threatens economic development
|
|
Why
Extreme Designation is Necessary
Gives us time to make attainment in 2010.
All current controls stay in place; tougher
permits eventually placed on most sources.
We can control our own destiny; avoids handing
over control to federal EPA.
Gives time for state requirements for cleaner
cars and trucks to take effect.
Gives time for regulation of federal sources
(aircraft, trains) to take effect.
Gives time for new technological improvements
to reduce air pollution.
Allows time to develop a plan taking advantage
of new science developed by Central California
Ozone Study.
Stops the clock on federal sanctions:
- Prevents development of EPA FIP.
- Keeps $2 billion in highway funds flowing.
- Eliminates increased pollution offsets
for new facilities.
- Delays onerous and costly federal Title
V permitting of small and mid-sized businesses.
Gives time to eliminate federal duplication
of regional permitting program.
|